This article delves into the often-overlooked impact of guitar pick material on tone. We conduct a blind comparison test pitting a standard plastic pick against exotic alternatives: bone and blond wood. Using a consistent setup – a Schecter Spitfire guitar with EMG pickups and a Leini Ironheart amplifier – we meticulously analyze the sonic differences produced by each pick type. The test incorporates varying playing dynamics to fully explore the nuances of each material's response. Our goal is to determine whether the perceived tonal differences are significant enough to justify the often higher price tag of bone and wood picks.This in-depth review covers not only the distinct tonal characteristics of bone and wood picks compared to plastic, but also examines their durability and long-term value. We explore the anecdotal evidence surrounding the increased lifespan of these exotic picks, contrasting them with the more frequent replacement required for plastic picks. Ultimately, we aim to provide guitarists with a comprehensive understanding of how pick material influences sound, enabling informed choices based on individual playing styles and tonal preferences.
Read more: 5 Best Celluloid Guitar Picks You Need to Try
Testing the Contenders: Bone, Wood, and Traditional Picks
This experiment focuses on comparing the tonal qualities of three different guitar picks: a traditional plastic pick, a bone pick, and a blond wood pick. The goal is to determine if the material of the pick significantly affects the overall sound.
All picks were tested on the same guitar (a Schecter Spitfire with EMG pickups) and amplifier (a Leini Ironheart) to maintain consistency. This ensures that any differences heard are primarily attributable to the pick itself.
A series of riffs were played using each pick, focusing on variations in playing dynamics – soft, medium, and hard attacks – to highlight any subtle changes in tone and response.
Sound Differences: A Comparative Analysis
The bone pick produced a noticeably warmer tone and a stronger attack, even with softer playing. This resulted in a richer, more pronounced sound across the frequency spectrum.
The blond wood pick offered a different character; it seemed to reduce the harshness or “brassiness” that can sometimes occur, particularly with brighter strings. The overall tone felt smoother and more mellow.
The traditional plastic pick served as the baseline for comparison, providing a familiar tone for reference. The distinct differences in tonal quality between the plastic, bone, and wood picks confirmed that pick material significantly impacts sound.
Durability and Long-Term Use
A key advantage highlighted in this comparison was the potential for increased durability with the bone and wood picks. Unlike traditional plastic picks that wear down or break easily, these materials are said to sharpen over time.
The sharper edge is likened to playing with a fresh set of strings, maintaining a consistent tone and attack. While this remains to be seen in long-term use, the claim is supported by anecdotal evidence.
One source mentioned a bone pick lasting 25 years, suggesting their superior lifespan and cost-effectiveness compared to frequently replacing plastic picks.
Overall Conclusion and Recommendation
The bone pick emerged as a clear favorite, offering a warmer tone and stronger attack with less effort. The wood pick offered a desirable smoother sound, reducing string harshness.
While the price point of exotic picks is generally higher, their longevity and unique tonal characteristics make them a worthwhile investment for discerning players.
This review strongly suggests that the material of a guitar pick does affect tone. The differences are subtle but noticeable, especially to a skilled ear. Choosing a pick material depends greatly on personal preferences and sound goals.